No. 088

The streetcar that should have been a bus.

A cautionary tale in three funding cycles.

In the 2010s, American cities found a familiar answer to downtown traffic: build a streetcar. The vehicle looked permanent and inviting, and the tracks seemed to promise a lasting route. But many of these lines ran in mixed traffic, stopping at signals and behind cars. A rail vehicle is not automatically a fast vehicle; if it shares a congested street, it inherits the street’s delays.

I am Ines Halvorsen, a former transit planner. I have seen people celebrate the arrival of a new line and then discover that its speed and frequency do not match the image in the brochure. Some downtown streetcars have been slower than walking or a bus on the same street, particularly where they had no dedicated right of way and frequent signal delays. That is a general pattern, not a verdict on every project.

Tracks do not create priority.

Streetcars can be useful when they connect real destinations, operate frequently, and have a path that lets them move. Dedicated lanes or other forms of priority help keep them out of queues. Frequent service makes waiting manageable. A route that reaches homes, jobs, institutions, and useful transfers has a reason to be ridden beyond the novelty of the vehicle.

— Ines

A slower note for the ride

← Back to the archive